Debate: University, Sustainability and Transition (EN)

Tentoonstelling
The weekly actions of the so-called ‘klimaatspijbelaars’ have put the issue of climate change and the lack policy measures proportionate to the problems at hand firmly on the table again. In this debate, we will look at the role that the universities can and should play in addressing the challenges posed by climate change.

The actions of the ‘klimaatspijbelaars’ gave rise to a public debate on
climate change and the way it should be addressed. In several ways, the
role of scientists was one of the topics under discussion. Some argued that
scientists should stick to communicating the facts and that we should
clearly separate science from politics. For others, the issue of climate
change blurred the line between science and politics. The responsibility of
scientists for them goes beyond merely ‘stating the facts’.

These facts have been around for a while now. The IPCC (Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change) was founded in 1988 and published its first
Assessment Report in 1990. Since then, it has kept publishing reports on
the existence of climate change and the expected consequences.
International climate summits have however been criticised as failing to
result in effective international policy. Does this discrepancy between the
urgency of the facts and the inertia of policy mean that scientists have
not stated the facts clearly enough? Should they be more clear in their
communication? Or does it indicate that there is a limit to the
effectiveness of ‘just stating the facts’ in order to change things?

The relation between politics and science is also implicated in the debate
on so-called ‘ecorealism’. According to ‘ecorealists’, the problem
cannot be solved by ‘costly’ or ‘unpopular’ measures, but only
through research, technology and innovation. This view is presented as a
‘rational’ or ‘realistic’ policy based on science. What is hidden
beneath it, however, is the (political) decision as to what research should
be deemed relevant. It also presupposes that the problem can be solved by a
‘more of the same’-formula, whereas questions can be asked about the
way scientific research is organised, the relation between universities and
industry, political decisions about what is deemed worthy of research, and
the circulation of knowledge and innovations developed at universities.

Moderator: Barbara Van Dyck

Speakers: Anneleen Kenis (more to be announced)

Praktische informatie

Waar
Muntpunt, Literair salon (+1) Munt 1000 Brussel
Wanneer
25/04 om 19:00
Organisatie